On 3/12/10, Cohen & Slamowitz attorney Carol Van Houten decided to mail my 5-page 3/10/10 fax with my Notice of Publication to the judge.
Dear Honorable Sir:
With regard to the above-referenced matter, our office has received the enclosed correspondence which we believe to be a Reply. We are enclosing a copy of same as it is not clear whether a copy was provided to the Court.
It is respectfully requested that the Reply be disregarded by Your Honor as it is more akin to a barrage of ad hominem attacks than a salient response to our opposition.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
COHEN & SLAMOWITZ, LLP
Carol Van Houten, Esq.
Attached to this letter was my 3/10/10 fax with my Notice of Publication.
I have absolutely NO explanation for attorney Van Houten’s absurd “belief” that this was my client’s Reply to the court. Are they on CRACK? How could attorneys not know what a notice of publication is?
Does anyone at Cohen & Slamowitz have an IQ above 50?
As of 3/28/10, I have NOT received any answers from anyone at Cohen & Slamowitz to my questions.
Note: Attorney Van Houten claims to have mailed a copy to my client.
In fact, this bizarre letter was NOT mailed to my client until 3/17/10, 5 days later. On 3/15/10, my client filed the “Reply” she referenced in her letter to the judge. I assume that they would NOT have mailed this letter to my client at all if he had not filed his Reply on the 15th.
Could the Cohen & Slamowitz practices be any more UNFAIR?