1/8/09 News Release

(LitigationNews) January 8, 2009—Dr. Tameira Hollander filed suit against her former patient Barbara Bailey and her husband John Bailey and against CreditSuit.org blog owner Christine Baker.  Ms. Baker found the summons, complaint and temporary restraining order outside her garage on December 12, 2008 and she removed her blog as required by the court’s order.  Ms. Baker seeks legal representation to vacate the TRO and to litigate this case to discourage future frivolous and harassment suits against consumer activists.

On October 17, 2008, attorneys Irving G. Johnson and Grant Wylie with Pryor Johnson Carney Karr Nixon, P.C. in Greenwood Village, Colorado,  filed the lawsuit on behalf of Dr. Tameira Hollander in Arapahoe County District Court, case # 08CV2229.  

Dr. Hollander alleged that Ms. Baker republished “this same false and libelous information.  In fact, Ms. Baker only posted the LINK to the Baileys’ website “Tameira Hollander Nearly Killed My Wife*”, along with her comment:  “A great site and fantastic example of how everybody should DOCUMENT and PUBLICIZE their complaints!”

On 8/9/08, Ms. Baker received an ANONYMOUS demand through her web contact form to remove UNIDENTIFIED allegedly libelous information and it referenced http://tameirahollandermd.com – a site Ms. Baker knew nothing about until she received this notice.

The next day Ms. Baker requested the identification of the libelous information by email to the address provided on the web form.  However, her email was returned undeliverable.  Ms. Baker posted the entire correspondence at CreditSuit.org so that the anonymous complainant would see her good faith offer:

“Providing the URL(s), the EXACT quotes that are libelous and the documentation will result in corrections and/or updates.”

On 11/25/08, Ms. Baker received the 2nd submission related to Dr. Hollander through her contact form, claiming to be from attorney Irving G. Johnson. Ms. Baker did not believe that the sender really was an attorney as he misspelled “suit” and he also failed to provide a valid email address.

The entire message was very unprofessional and he wrote: 

“… I will gladly serve you if you don’t remove her name from your website. …”

This sentence captures the essence of this litigation.  It is NOT libel to publish a name. Dr. Tameira Hollander and her attorneys attempted to intimidate Ms. Baker into rewriting history and creating the false appearance that Dr. Hollander was never accused of almost killing a patient.

On 12/11/08 around 7:30 AM, Ms. Baker woke up after less than 3 hours sleep when a man was screaming and banging on her door.  She was terrified, as she lives in the desert, her driveway is roped off and nobody in their right mind trespasses on private property in Arizona. 

The maniac was there for what seemed like an eternity, screaming and banging at her doors and window.  If the window had been open, he would have touched her.  Ms. Baker was scared to death that he would enter her home – until 12/11/08, she rarely locked the doors.

The following evening, Ms. Baker observed the intruder pulling up at her driveway, ignoring the NO TRESSPASSING signs, removing the rope and driving onto her private property as if he owned it.  After he left, she found Dr. Tameira Hollander’s complaint, summons and TRO outside her garage.

Ms. Baker decided to purchase a gun and to implement security measures and the next person to terrorize her will learn a painful lesson.  Notably, she had posted at her websites many times that she will waive service if a complaint and summons are faxed to her.  Ms. Baker does not evade service because she does nothing wrong.

As Ms. Baker specializes in exposing and documenting scams and frauds, she has received many attorney threats of defamation suits.  None ever sued, as it is perfectly LEGAL to publish the TRUTH.

If Ms. Baker were to delete all references to Dr. Hollander, all the other subjects of her documentaries could sue her to have the TRUTH deleted.  Consumer MUST be able to warn others about incompetent doctors and fraudulent credit offers. As Ms. Baker documented numerous times, most scammers deceive and defraud with impunity because the regulators refuse to enforce consumer protection laws.

The judge ordered Ms. Baker to remove all statements critical of Dr. Hollander and to remove her blog at creditsuit.org.  The exhibits and arguments in the motion for the TRO pertained only to the Baileys.

Dr. Hollander and her attorneys Johnson and Dorweiler IGNORED Ms. Baker’s repeated requests to provide documentation to substantiate the allegations and they provided NOTHING. They also ignored Ms. Baker’s offer to add their statement to http://doctor-tameira-hollander-litigation.info and to include it in this news release.

Ms. Baker is seeking an attorney willing to fight for free speech, to ensure that the 1st Amendment is upheld and to discourage future frivolous and harassment suits. Her contact information is at http://creditfactors.com/about/contact/.



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.