Doctors are organizing to legally censor their patients

A reader sent me the link to this very interesting article:

Medical Experts Riled as Doctors Try to Censor Their Patients

Thursday, February 19, 2009
By Joseph Abrams

Doctors across the country are forcing their patients to sign waivers giving up their right to post comments and reviews about them online, a move experts say is unethical and should be prohibited.

“It was not only patients posting information, but people posing as patients,” Segal said, including “disgruntled employees, ex-spouses and competitors.”

Consumer-oriented Web sites like RateMDs and give Web users a chance to recommend and review physicians and hospitals nationwide. But some doctors now are telling their patients to censor themselves — or find another physician.

“This is just the guild trying to protect itself from accountability to those it serves. That’s not professional behavior — this is self-interested behavior,” said Laurence McCullough, professor of medical ethics at Baylor College of Medicine.

“And as a rule, when a doctor acts primarily out of self-interest, it’s ethically suspect.”

Among the groups spearheading the move is a company called Medical Justice, which says it is helping protect doctors from online libel, which it says is an “emerging threat” within the medical profession.

Dr. Jeffrey Segal, a former neurosurgeon who founded Medical Justice to help doctors fight off lawsuits, said he robustly supports the sites in theory, but in practice they aren’t properly monitored and can do irreparable harm to a doctor’s reputation — especially when people pretending to be former patients write phony reviews.

Segal and other medical experts say that while the ratings sites may have good intentions, little of the information they impart is of use, as the most important indicators of clinical care can only be judged by experts. The rest, they say, is just “random discussion.”

“I think the real problem is that the info may not be all that useful,” said Dr. Wendy Mariner, a law professor and director of the Patients’ Rights Program at Boston University. “Patients may be able to evaluate whether a physician is responsive, courteous, on time, provides useful info to the patient,” she said, but they cannot judge the most important issues concerning medical care.

But Mariner said the waivers create “an adversarial relationship” between doctors and patients, and could possibly limit options for patients seeking care. “If this kind of thing gains any traction, medical licensing boards will, and I think should, prohibit it,” she told

Even without action from medical boards, Mariner said patients should be wary of doctors who ask them to muzzle themselves.

“What patient would want to go to a physician that asks for a waiver? It’s a big red flag signaling that the physician is afraid of being evaluated,” she said.

Under the terms of the agreements, patients promise they “will not denigrate, defame, disparage or cast aspersions upon” their doctors or post comments to any Web pages by name or anonymously, according to one contract obtained by Florida Health News.

Legal experts say private practices are permitted to ask this of their patients, and they do not violate any free speech laws.


Last time I went to see a doctor, I was in HORRIBLE pain and had to have a wisdom tooth pulled.  I had to sign a whole bunch of papers and I have NO idea what I signed.  But I posted my review at CreditSuit.

I couldn’t possible have cared less about my right to publicize my opinion about the treatment.  And even if I hadn’t been in pain, would I really want to go home and find another doctor?  I drove 120 miles to get there.

I remember setting up an appointment for a routine exam with my gynecologist in 1998 before I left San Francisco.  I had to wait SIX WEEKS!!!  HMOs …

One can only hope to NOT NEED a doctor. 

Eat healthy, organic food, get out into the SUNSHINE and pick up a shovel to get some exercise.

Doctors sure are turning healing and GOOD work into another vile profession. 

Right up there with LAWYERS.

Of course there still are very competent and caring doctors and lawyers, but obviously there are many incompetent scumbags.

I wonder if doctor Tameira Hollander requires her patients to sign a waiver of their 1st Amendment rights.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.